Ellen L Air, Ronald E Warnick, Christopher M McPherson
Surgical Neurology International 2012 3(5):315-319
Background: Although frameless stereotactic needle biopsy is an accepted procedure for the diagnosis of intracranial lesions, findings are nondiagnostic in 2-15% of patients and no recommendations yet exist to guide subsequent care. After reviewing the postoperative course after nondiagnostic biopsy of 28 patients, we developed a paradigm to guide management in the future. Methods: In reviewing the medical records of 284 frameless stereotactic needle biopsies (January 2000 to December 2006), we identified a subset of 28 patients who underwent 29 (10.2%) biopsies that did not yield a definitive diagnosis based on permanent pathologic samples. Postoperative treatment plans and clinical courses were further examined in 21 patients; 7 without follow-up were excluded. Results: Of the 21 patients, lesion location and characteristics guided the surgeon's decision to recommend further surgery or initiate empiric treatment. Soon after initial biopsy, five patients underwent a second procedure (biopsy or resection) that yielded diagnostic pathologic tissue. Of 16 patients who had empiric treatment, 7 (43.7%) subsequently had their treatment plan changed because of a lack of improvement and 5 underwent a second biopsy (4 diagnostic). Evolving clinical information precipitated treatment change in two patients. Of 10 patients who had a second surgery for better diagnostic information, the diagnostic yield was 90%. Conclusions: Considering the 90% diagnostic yield, we now recommend repeat surgery for most patients with nondiagnostic biopsies, especially for lesions considered potentially neoplastic or infectious. Empiric management, for lesions likely to be neurodegenerative, is an option but requires close follow-up examination.
Surgical Neurology International 2012 3(5):315-319
Background: Although frameless stereotactic needle biopsy is an accepted procedure for the diagnosis of intracranial lesions, findings are nondiagnostic in 2-15% of patients and no recommendations yet exist to guide subsequent care. After reviewing the postoperative course after nondiagnostic biopsy of 28 patients, we developed a paradigm to guide management in the future. Methods: In reviewing the medical records of 284 frameless stereotactic needle biopsies (January 2000 to December 2006), we identified a subset of 28 patients who underwent 29 (10.2%) biopsies that did not yield a definitive diagnosis based on permanent pathologic samples. Postoperative treatment plans and clinical courses were further examined in 21 patients; 7 without follow-up were excluded. Results: Of the 21 patients, lesion location and characteristics guided the surgeon's decision to recommend further surgery or initiate empiric treatment. Soon after initial biopsy, five patients underwent a second procedure (biopsy or resection) that yielded diagnostic pathologic tissue. Of 16 patients who had empiric treatment, 7 (43.7%) subsequently had their treatment plan changed because of a lack of improvement and 5 underwent a second biopsy (4 diagnostic). Evolving clinical information precipitated treatment change in two patients. Of 10 patients who had a second surgery for better diagnostic information, the diagnostic yield was 90%. Conclusions: Considering the 90% diagnostic yield, we now recommend repeat surgery for most patients with nondiagnostic biopsies, especially for lesions considered potentially neoplastic or infectious. Empiric management, for lesions likely to be neurodegenerative, is an option but requires close follow-up examination.
Sent with MobileRSS HD FREE
No comments:
Post a Comment